<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>On The Air &#187; Static</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tv.computer-vet.com/category/static/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com</link>
	<description>On The Air is Scott Schrantz' Blog About TV</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Race 13 BitTorrent Files</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2008/09/28/amazing-race-13-bittorrent-files/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2008/09/28/amazing-race-13-bittorrent-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a break that lasted the better part of a year, the Amazing Race is finally back with its 13th season. And even though this website is more or less dead, there is one section of it that I&#8217;ll still be keeping alive. The episode downloads can be found at the usual place, on my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="thumbnail"><a href="http://tv.computer-vet.com/pictures/2008/09/tar-13-racers.jpg"><img src="http://tv.computer-vet.com/pictures/2008/09/tar-13-racers-500x194.jpg" alt="" title="tar-13-racers" width="500" height="194" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-108" /></a></p>
<p>After a break that lasted the better part of a year, the Amazing Race is finally back with its 13th season. And even though this website is more or less dead, there is one section of it that I&#8217;ll still be keeping alive. The episode downloads can be found at the usual place, on my <a href="http://tv.computer-vet.com/bittorrents/amazing-race-bittorrent-files/">Amazing Race BitTorrent page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2008/09/28/amazing-race-13-bittorrent-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC Fall Schedule</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/05/14/nbc-fall-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/05/14/nbc-fall-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 23:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scrubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studio 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Apprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upfronts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/05/14/nbc-fall-schedule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time again, upfronts season. This week is when the big TV networks all announce their fall schedules, including which new pilots are in and which failed shows from last year are out. And while the upfronts are supposed to be geared just towards advertisers, over the last decade, with the rise of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that time again, upfronts season. This week is when the big TV networks all announce their fall schedules, including which new pilots are in and which failed shows from last year are out. And while the upfronts are supposed to be geared just towards advertisers, over the last decade, with the rise of the internet, it&#8217;s really turned into a huge press day for letting the viewers know which new shows will be coming out this September.</p>
<p>Today was NBC&#8217;s day to make their announcements. And I&#8217;m not going to cover everything, since you can find full coverage in a hundred other places, including <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/05/14/the-upfronts-nbc/">TV Squad</a> and <a href="http://www.zap2it.com/tv/zap-nbc2007-08schedule,0,4341254.story">Zap2It</a>. But here are some of the things that jump out at me:</p>
<p><strong>Scrubs</strong> had been on the bubble over the last few weeks, with news coming out that it was renewed, or it was cancelled, or NBC was cancelling it and it would move to ABC, to a hundred other possibilities. But today it&#8217;s official that the show is staying on NBC, Thusday nights, although this will almost surely be the last season. For a show that has ridden under the radar with middling ratings for its entire life, seven seasons is damn good. Glad to see it&#8217;s back.</p>
<p><strong>Studio 60</strong> is cancelled. Officially. Which isn&#8217;t a huge surprise since it got trememdously low ratings and was jerked all around the schedule this spring. At least it wasn&#8217;t cancelled and pulled early in the season, like so many other unlucky shows were, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t treated well. It&#8217;s coming back on May 24th to finish out the rest of the season, probably another six episodes. And that&#8217;s a courtesy many cancelled shows don&#8217;t get, so I guess we should be happy.</p>
<p>Also cancelled: a whole raft of midseason shows that just didn&#8217;t catch on. This was a really weak midseason, for all the networks but NBC in particular. <strong>The Black Donnellys</strong>, <strong>Andy Barker, P.I.</strong>, <strong>Raines</strong>. Didn&#8217;t watch &#8216;em, don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p><strong>Heroes</strong> is back, of course. It&#8217;s one of the biggest hits NBC has right now. And next year they&#8217;re making <a href="http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-nbcupfronts-heroesorigins,0,5536579.story">six extra episodes</a>, called &#8220;Heroes: Origins&#8221;, that will be outside the season&#8217;s main story arc and each introduce one new character. Kind of a strange idea, and we&#8217;ll have to see how it plays out. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with more Heroes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zap2it.com/news/custom/photogallery/zap-photogallery-nbcupfronts-2007,0,3596781.photogallery"><strong>New shows</strong></a>: All dramas and dramadies this year for NBC. And they&#8217;re trying to cash in on the whole sci-fi/superheroes thing a little bit, which might backfire on them. <strong>Bionic Woman </strong>is an update of the old show from the 70s, <strong>Journeyman</strong> is about a guy who travels through time changing lives, and <strong>Chuck</strong> is an ordinary guy who gets a bionic brain implant. Can&#8217;t say any of those jump out at me, but I&#8217;ll probably give the first episodes a try, at least.</p>
<p><strong>The Apprentice</strong> is not on the schedule at all, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s dead. It just means they still have a Trump headache and don&#8217;t want to think about him for a while. Can&#8217;t say I blame them.</p>
<p>Tomorrow? ABC&#8217;s new shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/05/14/nbc-fall-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS&#8217; Pirate Master</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/04/19/cbs-pirate-master/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/04/19/cbs-pirate-master/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirate Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/04/19/cbs-pirate-master/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new reality show from Mark Burnett is Pirate Master. It’s Survivor on the high seas. It looks balls-out awesome, but we have to wait until the end of next month to find out. TV Guide has a first look: The wannabe brigands dress in period costumes, eat such yummy authentic food as gruel &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new reality show from Mark Burnett is <a href="http://www.cbs.com/primetime/pirate_master/" target="_self">Pirate Master</a>. It’s Survivor on the high seas. It looks balls-out awesome, but we have to wait until the end of next month to find out. <a href="http://www.tvguide.com/News-Views/Interviews-Features/Article/default.aspx?posting={B5D34333-2687-48B8-9882-62EBE62A2173}" target="_self">TV Guide has a first look</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The wannabe brigands dress in period costumes, eat such yummy authentic food as gruel &#8211; the officers get better rations &#8211; and are ruled over by an elected captain who assigns roles to the crew members and can be overthrown if he doesn’t treat his crew well. Mutiny, anyone? Each week at &#8220;Pirate’s Court&#8221; &#8211; which are, according to Burnett, modeled after actual tribunals &#8211; a player is cast off the ship and set adrift on a raft. &#8220;If you can’t run with the crew, if you can’t swim or row or navigate, you’re a liability.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is either going to be the next Survivor or the next Treasure Hunters. I’m betting on the former. Mark Burnett is a freaking genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/04/19/cbs-pirate-master/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off The Air</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/30/off-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/30/off-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/30/off-the-air/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the next two weeks I&#8217;ll be watching TV from hotel rooms and not writing about it. Should be nice. See you in mid April!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://tv.computer-vet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/indianhead.jpg" alt="indianhead.jpg" /></p>
<p>For the next two weeks I&#8217;ll be watching TV from hotel rooms and not writing about it. Should be nice.</p>
<p>See you in mid April!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/30/off-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad TV Spin-Offs</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/24/bad-tv-spin-offs/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/24/bad-tv-spin-offs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/24/bad-tv-spin-offs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Top 10 bad TV spin-offs, compiled by Celebrity Hack. Listed on there are AfterMASH, Joanie Loves Cachi, and That 80&#8242;s Show. Most of the shows are from the 70s and 80s, I guess just because there was a lot of bad TV floating around back then. And also because the spin-off is mostly dead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.celebrityhack.com/bad-tv-show-spin-offs">The Top 10 bad TV spin-offs</a>, compiled by Celebrity Hack. Listed on there are AfterMASH, Joanie Loves Cachi, and That 80&#8242;s Show. Most of the shows are from the 70s and 80s, I guess just because there was a lot of bad TV floating around back then. And also because the spin-off is mostly dead these days. You only get one every couple of years, where back in the 80s it seemed like every week there was a new spin-off of some third-rate show. Some of them were good, and some of them were on <a href="http://www.celebrityhack.com/bad-tv-show-spin-offs">this list</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/24/bad-tv-spin-offs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2007 Bubble</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/the-2007-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/the-2007-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scrubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studio 60]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/the-2007-bubble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variety has an article this week about which shows are &#8220;on the bubble,&#8221; that is to say the ones that are in danger of being cancelled to make way for new shows in the fall. Luckily none of the shows I watch are on the list, except Studio 60. But I&#8217;ve had months to prepare [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960879.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">Variety has an article this week</a> about which shows are &#8220;on the bubble,&#8221; that is to say the ones that are in danger of being cancelled to make way for new shows in the fall. Luckily none of the shows I watch are on the list, except <em>Studio 60</em>. But I&#8217;ve had months to prepare for <em>Studio 60&#8242;s </em>death.</p>
<p>One interesting thing is the note that <em>Scrubs</em> might switch networks, from NBC to ABC. Switching networks is something only a very few shows have been able to pull off, and most of them weren&#8217;t in their seventh season when it happened. But we&#8217;re always expecting every season of <em>Scrubs</em> to be its last, just because it never seems to find a big enough audience, so nothing will come as a surprise.</p>
<p>Of course, you also have to wonder when a show is considered &#8220;off the bubble&#8221; and just plain old cancelled. Like, for example, <em>The Nine</em> is listed as a &#8220;long shot&#8221;. Which, consdiering they yanked it from the schedule last year and never even hinted they&#8217;d ever show any more episodes, I think it can be taken off the list. You know? &#8220;Long shot&#8221; means there&#8217;s actually some kind of chance.</p>
<p>The rest of the list are all shows that I don&#8217;t care about one bit. It&#8217;s a surprise to see <em>Jericho</em> on there, because I thought it was doing pretty well. Even if I did stop watching it months ago. The rest of them? They were duds right out of the box, and apparently I could tell because I never watched any of them. So they won&#8217;t be missed. Bring on the new pilots!</p>
<p>Hat tip: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/03/12/heres-a-list-of-shows-that-might-not-come-back-this-fall/">TV Squad</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/the-2007-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TWoP Sold</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/twop-sold/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/twop-sold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/twop-sold/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news has come out that my favorite TV site, Television Without Pity, has been acquired by Bravo. Now, acquisitions like this are always scary, because you never know what the new owners are going to change. But the site&#8217;s editors have assured us that everything we love about the site is going to stay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news has come out that my favorite TV site, <a href="http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/">Television Without Pity</a>, has been <a href="http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/misc/bravo.html">acquired by Bravo</a>. Now, acquisitions like this are always scary, because you never know what the new owners are going to change. But the site&#8217;s editors have assured us that everything we love about the site is going to stay the same, there will just be more of it. Along with podcasts and interviews and a bunch of new stuff that will only make the site bigger and better. I can only say I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/03/13/twop-sold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insider TV Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/22/insider-tv-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/22/insider-tv-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/22/insider-tv-bloggers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the cool things about blogging going mainstream is that people with other jobs, people who aren&#8217;t just reporters or technology folks, are getting into blogging, and it opens up whole new insights into how their particular craft works. Like TV bloggers. Sure, there are tons and tons and tons of blogs by critics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the cool things about blogging going mainstream is that people with other jobs, people who aren&#8217;t just reporters or technology folks, are getting into blogging, and it opens up  whole new insights into how their particular craft works. Like TV bloggers. Sure, there are tons and tons and tons of blogs by critics and viewers, but increasingly there are also blogs out there by people in the business. People who don&#8217;t just watch TV but who make it too, and for the first time ever they&#8217;re able to share their secrets with us on a weekly, or even daily, basis.</p>
<p>Like <a href="http://www.janeespenson.com/">Jane Espenson</a>, who is a working TV screenwriter but who also keeps up a blog giving tips to aspiring writers. Or <a href="http://kenlevine.blogspot.com/">Ken Levine</a>, a writer/prodcuer/director whose career goes back to MASH.</p>
<p>And the reason I&#8217;m writing this piece is <a href="http://gregbeeman.blogspot.com/">Greg Beeman</a>, who is a producer and sometime-director on the show <em>Heroes</em>. Like he isn&#8217;t busy enough working on one of the biggest new hits of the season, he also sits down every week to write up his thoughts on each week&#8217;s episode. And this is real behind-the-scenes stuff, not just talking about characters and the story, but talking about the actual work of making a TV show and all the things he has to keep straight. Like on the episode that aired earlier this week, he was the director. So he <a href="http://gregbeeman.blogspot.com/2007/02/episode-16-unexpected.html">talks for a bit</a> about some of the camera choices he made while filming.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the first scene with HRG and Isaac, HRG is in control of the scene. So in that one I used cranes and dollys and let the shots sweep and push in. Trying to visually mimic the emotion of the scene – pressure. The pressure HRG is putting on Isaac. After that, there’s a scene on the roof with Claude and Milo, where Claude beats the hell out of Peter with a Bo Stick. In this almost every shot is handheld and the camera trades off from character to character a lot. This technique adds a sense of chaos and unbalance &#8211; and whenever I cut wide to show the special relationships (important to do so your audience doesn’t get completely disoriented) I used big sweeping wide shots done from a crane, which are always passing over foreground objects. Moving past close foreground on full figure shots adds both a sense of speed and a sense of pressure.</p></blockquote>
<p>These are the kind of decisions that directors and cinemtographers have to make every day, but it&#8217;s so rare that we, the audience, get to poke inside their heads. But now, because these guys are able to blog (Greg doesn&#8217;t even post the blog himself &#8211; he admits he has his assistant do it), we can get a small hint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/22/insider-tv-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of Studio 60</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/20/end-of-studio-60/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/20/end-of-studio-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/20/end-of-studio-60/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Sassone at TV Squad: Will tonight be the end of Studio 60? Of course there were things wrong with the show. There are things wrong with every show. But it&#8217;s ridiculous to dissect every single aspect of every single episode of a show. What&#8217;s the point? You take it as a whole, realize that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Sassone at TV Squad: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/02/19/will-tonight-be-the-end-of-studio-60/">Will tonight be the end of Studio 60?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Of course there were things wrong with the show. There are things wrong with every show. But it&#8217;s ridiculous to dissect every single aspect of every single episode of a show. What&#8217;s the point? You take it as a whole, realize that there will be good and bad episodes, and continue to watch it and hope the bad things get better and the good things stay the same.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/02/20/end-of-studio-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People Who Claim Not To Watch TV</title>
		<link>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/01/11/people-who-claim-not-to-watch-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/01/11/people-who-claim-not-to-watch-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schrantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/01/11/people-who-claim-not-to-watch-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today on TVSquad: Things I Hate about TV: People who claim not to watch it. Somewhere along the line, watching television became cultural shorthand for being a stupid. Thus, for wannabe intellectuals, not watching television is the best way to prove to everyone that you&#8217;re intelligent. Saying, &#8220;I don&#8217;t own a TV&#8221; implies a life [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today on TVSquad: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/01/11/things-i-hate-about-tv-people-who-claim-not-to-watch-it/" title="">Things I Hate about TV: People who claim not to watch it</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Somewhere along the line, watching television became cultural shorthand for being a stupid. Thus, for wannabe intellectuals, not watching television is the best way to prove to everyone that you&#8217;re intelligent. Saying, &#8220;I don&#8217;t own a TV&#8221; implies a life of Shakespeare and smoking jackets.</p>
<p>Except, here&#8217;s the thing: Shakespeare was the television of his time (insofar as it was wildly popular and easily accessible by the masses). Seriously. His theater was on the wrong side of town, next to bear baiting pits (a sport that I fully expect Fox to revive before the end of this decade). The intellectuals of the day looked down on it as something vulgar and common. Shakespeare was filled with unnecessary sexual innuendo and broad, bawdy comedy &#8212; I mean, it really was Two and a Half Men of Verona.</p>
<p>So, if they can enjoy Shakespeare so much, why is it that &#8220;intellectuals&#8221; can&#8217;t enjoy popular culture? Because they&#8217;re being pretentious.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A thousand million &#8220;Amen&#8221;s to this article. I&#8217;ve known people like this, who don&#8217;t own a TV, or who only have a small set somewhere in a back bedroom, and who look down on us whenever we talk about TV shows. And I used to get riled up, but now my standard response is to just ignore them and to feel superior to <em>them</em> because of all the stuff I know they&#8217;re missing.</p>
<p>Our house has five TVs, four of them with DVD players attached. Our son has been watching TV since he was one, and most of those extra TVs are so he can watch what he wants without us having to switch off our programs. We just bought a van with a DVD player in the back, and we have a portable DVD that we take into restaurants. We&#8217;ve been criticized of using the &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0142001082/ref%3Dnosim/thecomputerve-20" title="">Plug In Drug</a>&#8221; on our child, and one lady we were out to dinner with actually <em>picked up the DVD player and turned it around</em> so the kids couldn&#8217;t see it. So, not only pretentious, but rude too.</p>
<p>And the thing is, the kid doesn&#8217;t even watch the TV when it&#8217;s on. He&#8217;ll ask for a movie, or for a TV show that we&#8217;ve burned to DVD for him, and five minutes into it he&#8217;s wandered off to play with his trains. So it&#8217;s not like the TV is taking over his life. We got him his own computer too. But everyone knows that having a computer just leads to writing (god forbid), and writing on the computer leads to him becoming a blogger. I can&#8217;t imagine a worse fate for him.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s the funny thing. We&#8217;ll be watching TV, and he&#8217;ll actually interrupt our show to ask us to read him a book. So I think he&#8217;s going to turn out just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.computer-vet.com/2007/01/11/people-who-claim-not-to-watch-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

